Abstract
AbstractThe day after the election night, on October 5th of 2020, several thousand Kyrgyz citizens poured in the direction of the main square of the capital Bishkek to denounce fraudulent elections. An estimated 1,250 people were injured, and one young person died. This third violent change of government in Kyrgyzstan’s short history of independence can be best understood as a combination of three distinct stories coming together under an unprecedented external shock produced by the coronavirus. First, a genuine citizen mobilization was triggered by the pandemic-related economic decline and rigged elections. Second, the initial peaceful protest was hijacked, to the surprise of the many, by a populist leader capitalizing on long-existing societal polarization. Third, the spectacular unfolding of the intra-opposition struggle downplays an important process of oligarchization, underlying the shaky grounds of patronal presidentialism in pluralist systems.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference53 articles.
1. Alexander LG, Bennett A (2005) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts
2. Cooley A, Heathershaw J (2017) Dictators without borders. Power and money in Central Asia. New Haven and London, Yale University Press
3. Current time (2019) V deputaty za $ 500 tysyach. Kto pokupaet mesta v parlamente Kyrgyzstana [online]. https://www.currenttime.tv/a/parliament-seats-on-sale/30219729.html. Accessed February 2, 2021.
4. Doolotkeldieva A, Heathershaw J (2015) State as resource, mediator and performer: understanding the local and global politics of gold mining in Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Survey 34(1):93–109
5. Doolotkeldieva A, Wolters A (2017) Uncertainty perpetuated? The pitfalls of a weakly institutionalized party system in Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Affairs 4(1):26–50
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献