Author:
Böger Tobias,Drobnič Sonja,Huinink Johannes
Abstract
AbstractThe size, structure, and productivity of populations have been major issues in politics since the emergence of the state in history. When the now-developed countries experienced the first wave of fertility decline, they reacted with population policy, including family policy, to counteract the looming reduction of national populations. After World War II, the opposite fear of global overpopulation started to dominate international discourse and population control became a model for national development. In our chapter, we ask whether this paradigm left room for a family policy. We analyse three major UN population conferences as platforms of interdependence and sketch how the two contrasting cases of China and Kenya have signalled commitment, criticism, or distance from global norms and whether their national policies mimicked global models.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference19 articles.
1. Barrett, Deborah Anne, and David John Frank. 1999. Population Control for National Development: From World Discourse to National Policies. In Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875, ed. John Boli and George M. Thomas, 198–221. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2. Chimbwete, Chiweni, Susan Cotts Watkins, and Eliya Msiyaphazi Zulu. 2005. The Evolution of Population Policies in Kenya and Malawi. Population Research and Policy Review 24 (1): 85–106.
3. Connelly, Matthew James. 2008. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Finkle, Jason L., and Barbara B. Crane. 1975. The Politics of Bucharest: Population, Development, and the New International Economic Order. Population and Development Review 1 (1): 87–114.
5. Hu, Aiqun. 2015. China’s Social Insurance in the Twentieth Century: A Global Historical Perspective. Leiden/Boston: Brill.