Abstract
AbstractThe central goal of this book is not just to make the claim about densification leading to social exclusionand gentrification in housing, but rather to explain—with the help of the IRRanalytical framework (see Chapter 2) —what local governance mechanisms at play are responsible for this development and to identify the reasons behind this complex situation. To accomplish this aim, three theoretical blocks were identified that help to understand densification from a neoinstitutional and actor-centered perspective: social sustainability in housing (dependent variable), institutions (independent variable), and actors’ use strategies (intermediary variable (see Chapter 2 for theoretical basis). At the end of Chapter 3, five research hypotheses are presented, which address all the main dimensions needed to cover the main research question in a convincing manner.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference197 articles.
1. Aalbers, M. B., & Holm, A. (2008). Privatising social housing in Europe: The cases of Amsterdam and Berlin. In K. Adelhof, B. Glock, J. Lossau, & M. Schulz (Eds.), Urban trends in Berlin and Amsterdam (pp. 12–23). Geographisches Institut der Humboldt-Universität.
2. Aalbers, M. B. (2017). The variegated financialization of housing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41, 542–554.
3. Achtenberg, E. P., & Marcuse, P. (1986). Toward the decommodification of housing. In R. Bratt, C. Hartman, & A. Meyerson (Eds.), Critical perspectives on housing (pp. 474–483). Temple University Press.
4. Alexander, D., & Tomalty, R. (2002). Smart growth and sustainable development: Challenges, solutions and policy directions. Local Environment, 7(4), 397–409.
5. Alexander, E. R., & Faludi, A. (1989). Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment & Planning b: Planning & Design, 16(2), 127–140.