Author:
Cedar Talli,Baker Michael J.,Bietti Lucas M.,Détienne Françoise,Nir Erez,Pallarès Gabriel,Schwarz Baruch B.
Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter we propose a methodological approach: we intend to explore the relations between children’s representations of moral issues as elaborated in dialogue (dialogue on ethics, DoE) and the ethical dimension of the children’s moral conduct towards each other (ethics of dialogue, EoD), where we expect to find interesting relations to explore. For example, if a child expresses tolerance towards a character in a video, to what extent does that child express tolerance towards the ideas and utterances of other children present in the interactive situation? The values we intend to focus on are the three main values at the heart of DIALLS: tolerance, empathy, and inclusion. We will examine the possible reciprocity between talking and doing, form and content, meta-dialogue and dialogue.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference31 articles.
1. Armaşu, V.D. 2012. Modern approaches to politeness theory. A cultural context. Lingua. Language and Culture 1: 9–19.
2. Baldwin, J.M. 1906. Mental development in the child and the race. New York: Macmillan & Co.
3. Bauman, Z. 1988. Strangers: The social construction of universality and particularity. Telos 28: 7–42.
4. Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Damon, W., and M. Killen. 1982. Peer interaction and the process of change in children’s moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 28 (3): 347–367.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献