Abstract
AbstractScales are neither natural nor neutral but actively and constantly produced and practised, with real political effects. Human-geographical and anthropological scholarship has demonstrated this with special attention to political-economic and social processes, but the project of understanding how cultural practices produce scale remains unfinished. A review of music research shows that it tends to use scalar categories (e.g. local, urban, regional, global, world) in varyingly critical ways, and as a field it therefore has both most to gain from and most to offer to a fuller conceptualisation of the cultural production of scale. In particular, music scholars should treat scales as open questions, and as phenomena potentially produced through musical practices, rather than as stable categories upon which to base, or with which to frame, other arguments. Attending to how music harnesses, manipulates, contests and constructs the scales that have been more commonly used to frame and explain it enables a richer musicological analysis and a deeper understanding of the world’s geographies.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference69 articles.
1. Agawu, K. (2016). Tonality as a colonizing force in Africa. In R. Radano & T. Olaniyan (Eds.), Audible empire: Music, global politics, critique (pp. 334–355). Duke University Press.
2. Bennett, A., & Peterson, R. A. (Eds.). (2004). Music scenes: Local, translocal and virtual. Vanderbilt University Press.
3. Blakey, J. (2021). The politics of scale through Rancière. Progress in Human Geography, 45(4), 623–640.
4. Brown, A., O’Connor, J., & Cohen, S. (2000). Local music policies within a global music industry: Cultural quarters in Manchester and Sheffield. Geoforum, 31(4), 437–451.
5. Brydon, D. (2016). Experimental writing and reading across borders in decolonizing contexts. Ariel: A Review of International English Literature, 47(1), 27–58.