Author:
Reibling Nadine,Ariaans Mareike,Hamel Lucas
Abstract
AbstractMedicine and psychology are key disciplines when it comes to childhood, particularly if it is problematized. In this chapter, Reibling, Ariaans, and Hamel argue that both the turn of Western welfare states toward social investment and the resulting new interest in children are paradigmatic examples of the shift toward a biopsychosocial welfare state. Medicine and psychology provide ideas, interventions, and professionals that the welfare state relies on in its aim to invest in children. The authors illustrate this idea via three empirical studies that analyze (1) the public communication of professional organizations, (2) the public’s view on children who experience problems, and (3) the institutionalization of learning disorders in Germany.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference104 articles.
1. Adamson, E., & Brennan, D. (2014). Social Investment or private profit? Diverging notions of ‘investment’ in early childhood education and care. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-013-0098-x
2. Alexander, P. A. (2018). Past as prologue: Educational psychology’s legacy and progeny. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000200
3. Ariaans, M., & Reibling, N. (2021). Die Rolle von Gesundheit und Krankheit im deutschen Armutsdiskurs. Zeitschrift Für Sozialreform, 67(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2021-0005
4. Berufsverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte. (2009a, February 2). Kinder leben in sozialer Armut in Deutschland: “Wir brauchen neue Konzepte früher Hilfen” [Press release]. Köln.
5. Berufsverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte. (2009b, February 25). Kinder leben in sozialer Armut in Deutschland: “Wir brauchen neue Konzepte früher Hilfen” [Press release]. Köln.