Abstract
AbstractThe leading scientists debating climate change increasingly view the relationship between knowledge and governance as an “inconvenient democracy.” On the one hand, the discrepancy between the knowledge of climate change and citizens’ commitments to behavioral changes amounts to the diagnosis of an “inconvenient mind”; on the other hand, the inertia of policies to capture progress in knowledge leads to the diagnosis of “inconvenient institutions.” The sense of political ineffectiveness felt especially among climate scientists provokes a strong disenchantment with democratic governance. As a result, some scientists propose that political action based on principles of democratic governance be abandoned. In my article, I argue that such a view is mistaken.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference96 articles.
1. Adolphe, J. (2018, November 11). Why are California wildfires so bad? The Guardian (London). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/sep/20/why-are-california-wildfires-so-bad-interactive
2. Aitken, M. (2012). Changing climate, changing democracy: A cautionary tale. Environmental Politics, 21, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.651899
3. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
4. Beeson, M. (2010). The coming of environmental authoritarianism. Environmental Politics, 19, 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903576918
5. Best, J. (2018). Technocratic exceptionalism: Monetary policy and the fear of democracy. International Political Sociology, 12, 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献