Cognitive Maps, Cultural Distances and National Stereotypes in Times of Crises: Comparing Greece and Hungary

Author:

Fokas Nikos,Jelenfi Gábor,Tardos Róbert

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter centres on polarised rearrangements of the imageries of ‘Others’ both in the Greek and the Hungarian public, during a period witnessing the impacts of the global financial crisis and the so-called ‘refugee crisis.’ We examined varieties of imageries of ‘Others’ in crisis situations, based on an online survey that was conducted in parallel in Greece and Hungary. Concurrently, we analysed the auto-stereotypical features of Greeks and Hungarians, along with their hetero-stereotype characteristics concerning some key nationalities (Americans, Arabs, Germans and Russians) to capture emerging patterns of sympathies, perceived skills and cultural distances. We found a substantial core of positive expressive auto-stereotypes among the Greek population. Hungarian auto-stereotypes reflected somewhat more instrumental-oriented self-images. The cognitive maps outlined by the two-mode network methodology displayed groupings of nationalities with related stereotypical attributes, such as ‘Western,’ ‘Eastern’ or ‘Peripheral.’ We also examined the beliefs of certain segments of the overall population depending on their exposure to financial and refugee crises. Media analyses of various activity domains conducted correspondingly for the respective countries highlighted substantial shifts between pre- and post-crisis patterns regarding both these countries’ positions and their characteristic features, as portrayed in the Greek and the Hungarian public discourse.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference46 articles.

1. Agresti, A. (2019). An introduction to categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

2. Angelusz, R., & Tardos, R. (1995). Styles of knowledge and interactive habits. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 111, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1995.111.57

3. Basov, N., Breiger, R. L., & Hellsten, L. (2020). Socio-semantic and other dualities. Poetics, 78, 1–12 (101433). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101433

4. Boda, D., & Simonovits, B. (2016). Reasons for flight: Does it make a difference? In B. Simonovits & A. Bernát (Eds.), The social aspects of the 2015 migration crisis in Hungary (pp. 48–57) TÁRKI.

5. Bodor, P., Fokas, N., & Előd, Z. (2016, July 10-14). From Lesvos to Budapest and beyond – The construction of the refugee problem in the Greek and Hungarian dailies. Paper presented at the 3rd ISA [forum of sociology], Vienna, Austria.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3