Controlling for Confounding in Complex Survey Machine Learning Models to Assess Drug Safety and Risk-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Controlling for Confounding in Complex Survey Machine Learning Models to Assess Drug Safety and Risk

Published:2023 Issue: Volume: Page:355-374
ISSN:2662-4869
Container-title:Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Computational Toxicology
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Rogers Paul

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-20730-3_14

Reference26 articles.

1. Anderson GD (2008) Gender differences in pharmacological response. Int Rev Neurobiol 83:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(08)00001-9

2. Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46(3):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786

3. Austin PC, Jembere N, Chiu M (2018) Propensity score matching and complex surveys. Stat Methods Med Res 27(4):1240–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216658920

4. Benedetto U, Head SJ, Angelini GD, Blackstone EH (2018) Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 53(6):1112–1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy167

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) Fourth Report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/index.html

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Identifying Vulnerabilities to NSAID Adverse Events in the U.S. Population: An Analysis of Preexisting Conditions and Sex;Journal of Women's Health;2024-07-01