Conclusions

Author:

Crowell Amber R.,Fossett Mark A.

Abstract

AbstractWe wrote this book with the central goal of documenting patterns and trends of racial and ethnic segregation across communities and over time in the United States using refined methods of measurement analysis, which can sometimes be expected to change what we thought we knew from past research and at other times add more to our understanding of established patterns. In making this our goal, we produced several contributions that happily build continuity with past research and set a foundation for future research, which we can expect to come in waves each time there is a decennial census data release. First and foremost, by using measures of segregation that are free of index bias and specifically employing the separation index, a measure of evenness that can dependably signal when prototypical patterns of segregation are occurring, we were able to reanalyze and describe patterns and levels of racial and ethnic residential segregation across the United States and over time. We are not the first to describe patterns of segregation, here operationalized as the uneven distribution of two groups across neighborhood-level spatial units, across communities and over time in the United States. But we are the first to simultaneously use measures that are corrected for index bias, measure segregation of households rather than persons, and expand our analysis to not only metropolitan areas but also micropolitan areas and noncore counties. Our findings should be viewed as reliable benchmarks for descriptive analyses of racial and ethnic residential segregation across a broad range of communities moving forward and should also be taken instructively, as they demonstrate the application of the methodological changes that we recommend should be the standard for residential segregation measurement. We also use Fossett’s (2017) difference-of-means calculation of segregation indices to demonstrate new approaches for linking locational attainments to residential segregation patterns, situating segregation quantitatively as a stratification outcome. In this final chapter, we describe how this study establishes continuity with past research and sets the path for residential segregation research in the future. 

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3