Abstract
AbstractXanthomonas wilt (XW) of banana caused by Xanthomonas vasicola pv. musacearum (Xvm) is an important emerging and non-curable infectious disease which can cause up to 100% yield loss. At the start of the XW epidemic, complete uprooting of diseased mats (CMU) was recommended. There was little adoption of CMU, especially by women farmers, because it was labor-intensive and it sacrificed banana production for up to 2 years. CMU assumed that infection on a single plant would systemically spread to all plants in a mat. However, field experiments showed that Xvm did not spread systemically in a mat and that latent infections occurred. As a result, not all shoots on an infected plant show symptoms. This led to the idea of removing only the visibly infected banana plants, referred to as single diseased stem removal (SDSR). The SDSR package comprises three innovations: (1) regularly cutting symptomatic stems at ground level, (2) sterilizing cutting tools with fire, and (3) early male bud removal using a forked stick. The SDSR package was promoted jointly with a set of complementary practices: (i) avoiding infections by browsing animals, (ii) using clean planting materials, (iii) bending leaves at the petiole level when intercropping in infected fields, (iv) training on disease recognition and epidemiology, and (v) demand-specific extension and knowledge sharing. Several approaches that have been used for scaling out XW management technologies are documented in this chapter. This review looks at the process, practices, challenges, lessons learned, and future policy implications associated with scaling of XW management practices.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference76 articles.
1. Abele S, Pillay M (2007) Bacterial wilt and drought stresses in banana production and their impact on economic welfare in Uganda: implications for banana research in east African highlands. J Crop Improv 19:173–191
2. Adeniji TA, Tenkouano A, Ezurike JN, Ariyo CO, Vroh-Bi I (2010) Value-adding post-harvest processing of cooking bananas (Musa spp. AAB and ABB genome groups). Afr J Biotechnol 9(54):9135–9141
3. Ajambo S, Rietveld A, Nkengla LW, Niyongere C, Dhedha DB, Olaosebikan DO, Nitunga E, Toengaho J, Lava KP, Hanna R, Kankeu R, Kankeu S, Omondi A (2018) Recovering banana production in bunchy top-affected areas in Sub-Saharan Africa: developing gender-responsive approaches. Acta Hortic 1196:219–228. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1196.27
4. Ajambo S, Mbabazi EG, Nalunga A, Kikulwe EM (2020) Gender roles and constraints in the green cooking banana value chain: evidence from southwestern Uganda. Acta Hortic 1272:135–144. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1272.17
5. Andrade-Piedra J, Bentley JW, Almekinders C, Jacobsen K, Walsh S, Thiele G (eds) (2016) Case studies of roots, tubers and bananas seed systems. CGIAR research program on roots, tubers and bananas (RTB), Lima: RTB Working Paper No. 2016–3. ISSN 2309-6586. 244 p
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献