Measuring What Matters: Standardized Versus Customizable impact Measurement Tools-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Measuring What Matters: Standardized Versus Customizable impact Measurement Tools

Published:2019 Issue: Volume: Page:75-93
ISSN:
Container-title:Business and the Sustainable Development Goals
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Tharani Adele

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-16810-0_4

Reference35 articles.

1. Balbastre, F., & Luzón, M. M. (2003). Self-Assessment Application and Learning in Organizations: A Special Reference to the Ontological Dimension. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(3), 367–388.

2. Barkemeyer, R. (2009). Beyond Compliance – Below Expectations? CSR in the Context of International Development. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(3), 273–289.

3. Baumgartner, R. J. (2014). Managing Corporate Sustainability and CSR: A Conceptual Framework Combining Values, Strategies and Instruments Contributing to Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 258–271.

4. Bjartmarz, T., & Rahbek Gjerdrum Pederson, E. (2015). CSR Standards and Social Accounting. In E. R. Pedersen (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Sage.

5. Bondy, K., & Starkey, K. (2014). The Dilemmas of Internationalization: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Multinational Corporation. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 4–22.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications;Journal of Applied Accounting Research;2021-12-14

2. Accountability by design? Exploring design characteristics of corporate social responsibility standards;Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal;2021-07-12