Ethical Issues Associated with Managing and Sharing Individual-Level Health Data

Author:

Kaur Sharon,Cheah Phaik Yeong

Abstract

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the generation of an unprecedented and exponentially mounting volume of data, including individual-level health data, bringing into sharp focus the importance of thinking about what constitutes ethical use of data in a public health emergency. The timely and appropriate use of such data (e.g. data from public health surveillance, electronic health records and research projects) has great potential to contribute to successful public health policies, effective therapeutic interventions and enhanced public support for, and trust in, governmental responses to the pandemic. However, a number of ethical issues arise from the use of different kinds of data, and the ways in which they are collected, processed and shared in the context of research during a pandemic. Two broad principles are generally associated with managing and sharing health data in research: first, that researchers should ensure research is carried out in a way that is respectful of persons and communities; and second, that the research is carried out in a manner that is fair to stakeholders, i.e. that it promotes equity. These should also remain the foundational principles of data sharing during a public health emergency. The principle of respect for persons and communities requires careful attention to be paid to consent processes for data sharing, justifications for waiving consent and approaches to protecting privacy and confidentiality. The promotion of equity prompts consideration of how the needs of differing stakeholders in data sharing are recognised and balanced, including appropriate forms of recognition for data sharers, and fair benefit sharing with the individuals and communities data have been collected from. The cases in this chapter illustrate issues arising when populations contribute data to a symptom-checker app, when heightened concerns arise raised about privacy and confidentiality in the context of collecting data about individuals who are potentially easily identifiable by their demographic characteristics, when very sensitive data is collected, and when a waiver of consent to access survey data is requested to enable potential participants of a study to be identified and contacted.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference33 articles.

1. Atan, Arif. 2020. Satu Malaysia sengsara, netizen kecam pesakit Covid-19 ke-136 “kuat merayap”. Malaysia Dateline, April 8. https://malaysiadateline.com/satu-malaysia-sengsara-netizen-kecam-pesakit-covid-19-ke-136-kuat-merayap/.

2. Bambra, C., R. Riordan, J. Ford, and F. Matthews. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 74(11): 964–968.

3. Bayer, R., and A.L. Fairchild. 2000. Public health – Surveillance and privacy. Science 290(5498): 1898–1899.

4. Berg, Jessica, Laura D. Buccini, and Catherine Koepper. 2018. Informed consent for registries. In Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user’s guide, ed. Richard E. Gliklich, N.A. Dreyer, and M.B. Leavy. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208622/.

5. Bhutta, Z.A. 2004. Beyond informed consent. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 82(10): 771–777.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3