Animal Ethics and the Philosophical Canon: A Proposal

Author:

Müller Nico Dario

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter concludes the book, discussing the main results and open questions for further research. It revisits the book’s basic agenda: to use Kantianism constructively, to revise it so that it includes animals in moral concern, and to be radical about it in the sense that duties to animals and human beings are set on equal philosophical footing. The chapter proposes that animal ethicists should take this approach to other figures from the history of philosophy, particularly if their views explicitly or implicitly exclude animals from moral concern.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference10 articles.

1. Abbey, Ruth. 2007. Rawlsian resources for animal ethics. Ethics and the Environment 12: 1–22.

2. Darwall, Stephen. 2009. Why Kant needs the second-person standpoint. In The Blackwell guide to Kant’s ethics, ed. Thomas E. Hill, 138–158. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

3. Fanselow, Ryan. 2008. A Kantian solution to Thompson’s puzzle about justice. Proceedings of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy 10: 91–99.

4. Grey, John. 2013. “Use them at our pleasure”: Spinoza on animal ethics. History of Philosophy Quarterly 30: 367–388.

5. Palatnik, Nataliya. 2018. Kantian agents and their significant others. Kantian Review 23: 285–306.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3