1. Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2010). A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s grammar. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909334430
2. Brady, U., Basurto, X., Bennett, A., Carter, D. P., Hanlon, J., Heikkila, T., Lien, A., Chonaiew, S. M., Olivier, T., Schlager, E., Siddiki, S., & Weible, C. (2018). Institutional analysis of rules-in-form coding guidelines (tech. rep.). Center for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment. https://complexityasu.edu/sites/default/files/papers/cbie_wp_2018-006_0.pdf
3. Carter, D. P., Weible, C. M., Siddiki, S. N., Brett, J., & Chonaiew, S. M. (2015). Assessing policy divergence: How to investigate the differences between a law and a corresponding regulation. Public Administration, 93(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12120
4. Clement, S., Moore, S. A., & Lockwood, M. (2015). Authority, responsibility and process in Australian biodiversity policy. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 32(2), 93–114.
5. Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A Grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975