Author:
Luzhnov P. V.,Iomdina E. N.,Ivanishchev K. V.,Shamaev D. M.,Kiseleva A. A.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference11 articles.
1. Whitacre, M.M., Stein, R.: Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv. Ophthalmol. 38(1), 1–30 (1993)
2. Özcura, F., Yildirim, N., Sahin, A., Çolak, E.: Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eye. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 8(2), 299–304 (2015)
3. Kouchaki, B., Hashemi, H., Yekta, A., Khabazkhoob, M.: Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 29(2), 92–97 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.010
4. Wachtl, J., Töteberg-Harms, M., Frimmel, S., Roos, M., Kniestedt, C.: Correlation between dynamic contour tonometry, uncorrected and corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry, and stage of glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 135(6), 601–608 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1012
5. Andreanos, K., Koutsandrea, C., Papaconstantinou, D., et al.: Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature. Clin. Ophthalmol. 10, 2477–2484 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203