Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference18 articles.
1. Bouzidi, L. H., & Jaillet, A. (2009). Can online peer assessment be trusted? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 257–268. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.257
2. Chang, C. Y.-H. (2016). Two decades of research in L2 peer review. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 81–117.
3. Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., & Lou, S.-J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers and Education, 58(1), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.005
4. Denies, K., & Janssen, R. (2016). Country and gender differences in the functioning of CEFR-based can-do statements as a tool for self-assessing English proficiency [article]. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1212055
5. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning. Environment, 59(s1), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00542.x