Civil Society Boundary Crossing and Elite Integration

Author:

Arvidson Malin,Uhlin Anders

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter explores elite boundary crossing between civil society and other societal sectors—including the state, party politics, and business—and how this may lead to inter-elite integration. We illustrate how qualitative life-work history interviews provide an important complement to established quantitative approaches to the study of elite integration. Through these interviews, we explore the drivers and motivations related to a boundary crossing career. The personal accounts of the boundary crossing experiences unveil essential aspects of the prerequisites of elite integration, if by integration we assume not only networking but also a degree of elite value congruence. This study identifies different motivations driving boundary crossing, making individuals more or less likely to contribute to value congruence. Those who move to another sector to impose values from their sector of origin typically contribute to value congruence. Those who leave a sector where they no longer feel at home and seek out new and more attractive values in another sector are less likely to contribute to value congruence. Those who move back and forth across sector boundaries to gain influence may or may not contribute to value congruence. This study opens up new ways of defining and exploring value congruence in elite integration studies.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference29 articles.

1. Anheier, H. K., & Seibel, W. (Eds.). (1990). The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations. Walter de Gruyter.

2. Brandsen, T., & Karré, P. M. (2011). Hybrid Organizations: No Cause for Concern? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 827–836.

3. Bühlmann, F., David, T., & Mach, A. (2012). Political and Economic Elites in Switzerland: Personal Interchange, Interactional Relations and Structural Homology. European Societies, 14(5), 727–754.

4. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. The MIT Press.

5. Dahl, R. (1963). Who Governs? Yale University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3