Author:
Reijers Wessel,Coeckelbergh Mark
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference46 articles.
1. Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2015). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation. In B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications (pp. 1–303). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5.
2. Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., & Stemerding, D. (2010). Anticipating the Interaction between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1098.
3. Bolsin, S., Faunce, T., & Oakley, J. (2005). Practical Virtue Ethics: Healthcare Whistleblowing and Portable Digital Technology. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(10), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010603.
4. Brey, P. (2012). Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7.
5. Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Care Robots, Virtual Virtue and the Best Possible Life. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & E. Spence (Eds.), The Good Life in a Technological Age. New York: Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献