Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems Under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems Under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem

Published:2023 Issue: Volume: Page:133-157
ISSN:2524-8049
Container-title:Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Escobar Veas Javier Ignacio^ORCID

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6_6

Reference51 articles.

1. Alastuey MC, Escuchuri E (2011) Ilícito penal e ilícito administrativo en materia de tráfico y seguridad vial. Estudios penales y criminológicos (31):7–86

2. Alcácer R (2013) El derecho a no ser sometido a doble procesamiento: discrepancias sobre el “bis in idem” en el Tribunal Europeo de Derecho Humanos y en el Tribunal Constitucional. Justicia administrativa: Revista de derecho administrativo (61):25–52

3. Bachmaier L (2019) New crime control scenarios and the guarantees in non-criminal sanctions: presumption of innocence, fair trial rights, and the protection of property. In: Sieber U (ed) Prevention, investigation, and sanctioning of economic crime. Alternative control regimes and human rights limitations. Maklu, pp 299–334

4. Bailleux A (2014) The fiftieth shade of grey. Competition law, ‘criministrative law’ and ‘fairly fair trials’. In: Galli F, Weyembergh A (eds) Do labels still matter?: Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law. The influence of the EU. Université de Bruxelles, pp 137–152

5. Benlloch G (1998) El principio de non bis in idem en las relaciones entre el Derecho penal y el Derecho disciplinario. Revista del poder judicial (51):303–376