1. Abbott NT (1992) United States v. Halper: making double jeopardy available in civil actions. BYU J Public Law 6(3):551–574
2. Adler AJ (2014) Dual sovereignty, due process, and duplicative punishment: a new solution to an old problem. Yale Law J 124(2):448–483
3. Albin L (1996) Notes: constitutional limitations of civil in rem forfeiture and the double jeopardy dilemma: civil in rem forfeiture constitutes punishment and is subject to excessive fines analysis. Aravanis v. Somerset County, 339 Md. 644, 664 A.2d 888 (1995), Cert. Denied, 116 S. Ct. 916 (1996). Univ Baltimore Law Rev 26(1):155–199
4. Alexander R, Rubin O, Vaughn A, Wingo C (1982) Collateral estoppel. Univ Richmond Law Rev 16(2):341–390
5. Allen R, Ratnaswamy J (1986) Heath v. Alabama: a case study of doctrine and rationality in the Supreme Court. J Crim Law Criminol 76(4):801–831