Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference67 articles.
1. Patel VR, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Orvieto M, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, et al. Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;186:511–6.
2. Matulewicz RS, DeLancey JOL, Manjunath A, Tse J, Kundu SD, Meeks JJ. National comparison of oncologic quality indicators between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2016;34(10):431.e9–431.e15.
3. Barocas DA, Han M, Epstein JI, Chan DY, Trock BJ, Walsh PC, et al. Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer? Urology. 2001;58(5):746–51.
4. Chuang AY, Nielsen ME, Hernandez DJ, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. The significance of positive surgical margins in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ-confined disease at radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178:1306–10.
5. Maxeiner A, Magheli A, Jöhrens K, Kilic E, Braun TL, Kempkensteffen C, et al. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus. BJU Int. 2016;118(5):750–7.