Author:
Mertens Alexander Christiaan,Broeders Ivo A. M. J.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference24 articles.
1. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, Soper N, Brunt M, Sheppard B, et al. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Trans Meet Am Surg Assoc. 2006;124:146–55.
2. Sathasivam R, Bussa G, Viswanath Y, Obuobi R-B, Gill T, Reddy A, et al. ‘Mesh hiatal hernioplasty’ versus ‘suture cruroplasty’ in laparoscopic para-oesophageal hernia surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2019;42(1):53–60.
3. Asti E, Lovece A, Bonavina L, Milito P, Sironi A, Bonitta G, et al. Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12):5404–9.
4. Zhang C, Liu D, Li F, Watson DI, Gao X, Koetje JH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective and subjective outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):4913–22.
5. Dunne N, Stratford J, Jones L, Sohampal J, Robertson R, Booth MI, et al. Anatomical failure following laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS): does it really matter? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(2):131–5.