Abstract
AbstractThis chapter presents the Norwegian tripartite system within a polycentric perspective. Developing multiple arenas among the parties has been a crucial factor in developing a mechanism for learning and adaptation within the regulatory regime. In the face of internal disturbance, new technology, and changes in the socio-economic environment, the regime has developed its capacity to enrol new actors and redefine their roles and behaviour.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference21 articles.
1. E.J. Balleisen, L.S. Bennear, K.D. Krawiec, J.B. Wiener, Policy Shock (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017)
2. P. Bang, O. Thuestad, Government-enforced self-regulation. The Norwegian case, in Risk Governance of Offshore Oil & Gas Operations, ed. by P.H. Lindøe, M. Baram, O. Renn (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)
3. H.C. Blakstad, Safety indicators used by authorities in the petroleum industry of the United Kingdom, the United States and Norway, in Risk Governance of Offshore Oil & Gas Operations, ed. by P.H. Lindøe, M. Baram, O. Renn (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)
4. K. Carlisle, R.L. Gruby, Polycentric systems of governance: a theoretical model for the commons. Policy Stud. J. 47(4), 927–952 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212
5. J.E. Dølvik, T. Fløtten, J.M. Hippe, B. Jordfald, The Nordic Model Towards 2030. A New Chapter? NordMod2030. Final Report (Fafo, Oslo, 2015)