Abstract
AbstractThe rapid breakdown of the climate has radical implications for hazardous industries and for the regulator–regulatee relationship. It will lead to an exponential increase in NaTech events, and as such will transform the scale and level of complexity of contingency planning. As most fossil-fuelled hazardous industries play an oversized role in overshooting planetary boundaries, these industries will need to transform radically or shut down. To tackle such challenges, the regulator–regulatee relationship needs to transform itself so as to still be relevant and impactful in a troubled future.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference18 articles.
1. D.I. Armstrong McKay, A. Staal, J.F. Abrams et al., Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377(6611), eabn7950 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950
2. E. Bonnet, D. Landivar, A. Monnin, Héritage et fermeture: une écologie du démantèlement (Editions Divergences, 2021)
3. P. Caye, Durer. Éléments pour la transformation du système productif (Les Belles Lettres, 2020)
4. B. Cosens, L. Gunderson, C. Allen, M. Benson, Identifying legal, ecological and governance obstacles, and opportunities for adapting to climate change. Sustainability 6(4), 2338–2356 (2014)
5. J. Etienne, Ambiguity and relational signals in regulator–regulatee relationships. Regul. Gov. 7(1), 30–47 (2013)