Australia

Author:

Stewart Miranda

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter discusses Australia’s unique brand of fiscal federalism, which has evolved under a Constitution that is more than 120 years old. While Australia’s fiscal federation is stable, Australia has high vertical fiscal imbalance with strong centralisation of taxing power and revenues at the national level, while many expenditure and governance responsibilities remain with subnational States and Territories. Vertical equalisation is delivered through unconditional and conditional grants from the federal government to subnational governments, and horizontal equalisation by a formula based on taxing capacity and spending needs, combined with conditional grants, politicised in various ways. The Chapter recommends reform to establish a new fiscal bargain supporting sharing of income tax and GST by both levels of government and to update fiscal arrangements to recognise and support Indigenous sovereignty self-government in the federation.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference95 articles.

1. ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2019a. Estimates and Projections, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2006–2031, ABS 3238.0 (latest issue released 11/7/2019), https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/3238.0Main%20Features402006%20to%202031?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3238.0&issue=2006%20to%202031&num=&view=.

2. ABS. 2019b. Australian Demographic Statistics, ABS 3101.0, June 2019 (latest issue released 19/12/19), https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3101.0Main+Features1Jun%202019?OpenDocument.

3. ANAO (Australian National Audit Office). 2020. Award of Funding Under the Community Sport Infrastructure Program, Report No 23 of 2019–20 (15 January), https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/award-funding-under-the-community-sport-infrastructure-program.

4. Appleby, G. 2009. “There Must Be Limits: The Commonwealth Spending Power”, 37(1) Federal Law Review, 93.

5. Appleby, G. and McDonald, S. 2011. “The Ramifications of Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation for the Spending Power and Legislative Powers of the Commonwealth”, 37(2) Monash University Law Review, 162–143.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3