Author:
Vloeberghs Ward,Bergh Sylvia I.
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter offers a working definition of social accountability as any citizen-led action beyond elections that aims to enhance the accountability of state actors. We view social accountability as a broad array of predominantly bottom-up initiatives, aimed at improving the quality of governance (especially oversight and responsiveness) through active citizen participation. We also trace the evolution of SA as a concept in the literature over the past decades and, then, discuss some influential theoretic approaches to SAIs, pointing out strengths and weaknesses of each model. Finally, we suggest organising Arab SAIs into one of three categories: (1) transparency; (2) advocacy; or (3) participatory governance and we review each of these existing action formats by discussing their main strengths and flaws.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference38 articles.
1. Ackerman, J. M. (2005). Social accountability in the public sector: A conceptual discussion and learning module (World Bank Social Development Paper No. 82). World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Event/MNA/yemen_cso/english/Yemen_CSO_Conf_Social-Accountability-in-the-Public-Sector_ENG.pdf
2. Allam, N., Berman, C., Clarke, K., & Schwedler, J. (2022). Between two uprisings: The study of protest in the Middle East, 2010–2020. In M. Lynch, J. Schwedler, & S. Yom (Eds.), The political science of the Middle East: Theory and research since the Arab uprisings (pp. 62–85). Oxford University Press.
3. Anderson, C. (2023). Understanding accountability in practice: Obligations, scrutiny, and consequences’. Development Policy Review, 41(S1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12687
4. Apter, D. (1968). Why political systems change. Government and Opposition, 3(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1968.tb01340.x
5. Bågenholm, A., Bauhr, M., Grimes, M., & Rothstein, B. (Eds.). (2021). The Oxford handbook of the quality of government. Oxford University Press.