1. Amonette, W. E., English, K. L., & Kraemer, W. J. (2016). Evidence-based practice in exercise science: The six-step approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
2. Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C. R., Hagen, N. A., Biondo, P. D., & Cummings, G. G. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool—Methodological research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.X .
3. Boland, A., Cherry, G. M., & Dickson, R. (2017). Doing a systematic review: A student’s guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Burke, S. (2016). Rethinking ‘validity’ and ‘trustworthiness’ in qualitative inquiry: How might we judge the quality of qualitative research in sport and exercise sciences? In B. Smith & A. C. Sparkes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 330–339). London, UK: Routledge.