Regulating AI: Challenges and the Way Forward Through Regulatory Sandboxes

Author:

Yordanova Katerina,Bertels Natalie

Abstract

AbstractFinancial industry was the first filed where it became clear that we needed a new type of regulation, an evolutionary and anticipatory approach that can at least stand chance to mitigate the new risks posed by disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). This approach took the shape of various tools, none of which has showed more prominence than the regulatory sandboxes. This rather young approach to regulation spread across various sectors and jurisdictions from FinTech to privacy and healthcare.The European Commission recognised the potential of the regulatory sandboxes as an increasing compliance mechanism but also as a way to facilitate innovation and thus included them as part of the draft regulation on artificial intelligence (the AI Act). In this article we analyse the potential of the regulatory sandboxes for regulating AI in the format envisioned in Article 53 and 54 from the draft AI Act and the challenges this approach could face based on the experience from earlier regulatory sandboxes involving AI products or services. We also aim to suggest some tailor-made solutions that would mitigate potential disadvantages of the regulatory sandboxes for AI, including how to balance the emerging ‘Innovation Principle’ and the protection of human rights.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference46 articles.

1. Agarwal K (2018) Playing in the regulatory sandbox. Nyujlb (blog). https://www.nyujlb.org/single-post/2018/01/08/playing-in-the-regulatory-sandbox. Accessed 20 Apr 2022

2. Armstrong H, Rae J (2017) A working model for anticipatory regulation, NESTA, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/working_model_for_anticipatory_regulation_0.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2022

3. Armstrong H, Gorst C, Rae J (2019) Renewing regulation ‘anticipatory regulation’ in an age of disruption. NESTA. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Renewing_regulation_v3.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2022

4. Arner DW, Barberis JN, Buckley RP (2016) The evolution of fintech: a new post-crisis paradigm? Georget J Int Law 47:1271–1320

5. Ausloos J, Heyman R, Bertels N, Pierson J, Valcke P (2018) Designing-by-debate: a blueprint for responsible data-driven research & innovation. In: Ferri F, Dwyer N, Raicevich S, Grifoni P, Altiok H, Andersen HT, Laouris Y, Silvestri C (eds) Responsible research and innovation actions in science education, gender and ethics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 47–63

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring Regulatory Sandboxes: Safeguarding AI-Based Software for Minors;Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good;2024-09-04

2. INNOVATIVE STARTUPS AND THE CHALLENGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: SOME INSIGHTS FROM ITALY AND ROMANIA;JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN ECONOMY;2024-03-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3