Digital Citizen Activism in Central Asia: Beyond Contestation and Cooperation

Author:

Kurmanov Bakhytzhan

Abstract

AbstractThe rise of digital activism in the Arab Spring and Euromaidan demonstrated the significance of social media and new technologies in mobilizing civil society activists in authoritarian regimes. Digital citizen activism has also been on the rise in post-Soviet Central Asia, with evidence that the October events in Kyrgyzstan in 2020 and the January riots in Kazakhstan in 2022 were fueled by heightened tension and the mobilization of citizens on social media. This chapter investigates how digital activism evolves and engages with authoritarian states in autocratic post-Soviet Central Asia. It is critical to understand how digital activists negotiate their roles of cooperation, contestation, and legitimation discourse (using the ( Lewis, D. (2013). Civil society and the authoritarian state: cooperation. contestation and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340. https://DOI:10.1080/17448689.2013.818767) framework) in the region's evolving autocracies and whether this leads to democratization.This chapter aims to answer these questions by uncovering the activities of the digital activist communities through in-depth interviews with activists in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan. Such a broad selection of cases widens the scope of this chapter and contributes to the understanding of digital citizen activism in non-Western settings. Ultimately, this chapter reveals the limits of digital activism in autocracies and how the authoritarian state manages to impose legitimation discourse on such activism.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference51 articles.

1. Arafa, M., & Armstrong, C. (2015). Facebook to mobilize, Twitter to coordinate protests, and YouTube to tell the world: New media, cyberactivism, and the Arab Spring. Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective, 10(1).

2. Bennetts, M. (2019, April 2). Evicted without warning: Sudden Tashkent demolitions spark anger. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/apr/02/evicted-without-warning-demolitions-spark-activism-in-tashkent-uzbekistan

3. Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI). (2022). Democracy status index. Transformation index. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://atlas.bti-project.org/

4. Bohdanova, T. (2014). Unexpected revolution: The role of social media in Ukraine’s euromaidan uprising. European View, 13(1).

5. Breuer, A., Landman, T., & Farquhar, D. (2015). Social media and protest mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian revolution. Democratization, 22(4), 764–792.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3