The Political, Economic, and Social Drivers of Responsible Sourcing Standards

Author:

Farooki Masuma,Graf Alexander,Endl Andreas,Degreif Stefanie

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter explores the societal drivers pushing for more responsible sourcing practices and behaviours and the pathways that were adopted to advocate for these changes. Underlying concepts promoting better governance, fair share of value, and securing and protecting the rights of vulnerable stakeholders resulted in several standards and tools to improve and monitor corporate performance. From sustainability guidelines to certification schemes and eventually legislation, this chapter drills down to the common denominator within these approaches and how they drive more responsible sourcing practices. These approaches included building awareness and increasing transparency around the environmental, social, governance, and economic impacts of operations. Civil society organisations and leading private and public sector actors, through advocacy and collaboration, influenced powerful actors within supply chains to enact change. Advocates provided recommendations for what responsible behaviours and objectives should be undertaken. Others constructed assurance mechanisms to evidence that change has taken place.

Funder

Re-Sourcing

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference50 articles.

1. Auty, Richard. 1993. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis. London: Routledge.

2. Betz, Johannes, Stefanie Degreif, and Peter Dolega. 2021. State of Play and Roadmap Concepts for Mobility Sector. Vienna: RE-SOURCING Project.

3. Bruce, Trevor. 2014. Managing Environmental, Social and Government (ESG) Risk in the Mining Industry: The Emerging Relevance of ESG Risk and the Dangers of Getting it Wrong. Final Submission for the McKinsey Risk Prize. Cambridge Judge Business School. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/riskprize2014-bruce.pdf. Accessed September 8, 2023.

4. Brundtland, Gro Harlem. 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Geneva: UN-Dokument A/42/427.

5. Campbell, Bonnie, and Pascale Hatcher. 2019. Neoliberal Reform, Contestation and Relations of Power in Mining: Observations from Guinea and Mongolia. The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (3): 642–653.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3