The Place of Traditional Birth Attendants in Global Maternal Health: Policy Retreat, Ambivalence and Return

Author:

MacDonald Margaret E.

Abstract

AbstractIn this chapter, I tell the story of the waxing and waning of the status of the traditional birth attendant (TBA) in global maternal health policy from the launch of the Safe Motherhood Initiative in 1987 to the present. Once promoted as part of the solution to reducing maternal mortality, the training and integration of TBAs into formal healthcare systems in the global south was deemed a failure and side-lined in the late 1990s in favour of ‘a skilled attendant at every birth’. This shift in policy has been one of the core debates in the history of the global maternal health movement and TBAs continue to be regarded with deep ambivalence by many health providers, researchers and policymakers at the national and global levels. In this chapter, I take a critical global heath perspective that scrutinises the knowledge, policy and practice of global health in order to make visible the broader social, cultural and political context of its making. In this chapter, I offer a series of critiques of global maternal health policy regarding TBAs: one, that the evidence cited to underpin the policy shift was weak and inconclusive; two, that the original TBA component itself was flawed; three, that the political and economic context of the first decade of the SMI was not taken into account to explain the failure of TBAs to reduce maternal mortality; and four, that the reorganisation of the Safe Motherhood movement at the global level demanded a new humanitarian logic that had no room for the figure of the traditional birth attendant. I close the chapter by looking at the return of TBAs in global level policy, which, I argue, is bolstered by a growing evidence base, and also by the trends towards ‘self-care’ and point-of-use technologies in global health.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference94 articles.

1. AbouZahr, C. (2001). Cautious champions: International agency efforts to get safe motherhood onto the Agenda. Studies in Health Services Organisation and Policy, 17, 387–414.

2. AbouZahr, C. (2003). Safe motherhood a brief history of the global movement 1947–2002. British Medical Bulletin, 67, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg014

3. Adams, V. (Ed.) (2016). Metrics. What counts in global health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

4. Adegoke, A., & van den Broek, N. (2009). Skilled birth attendance-lessons learnt. BJOG, 116(Suppl. 1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1009.02336.x

5. Allen, D. R. (1994). Managing motherhood managing risk. Fertility and danger in West Central Tanzania. University of Michigan Press.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3