The Domestication of Misoprostol for Abortion in Burkina Faso: Interactions Between Caregivers, Drug Vendors and Women
Abstract
AbstractMisoprostol has been hailed as a revolution within global maternal health research and policy communities because of its potential to reduce maternal mortality from post-partum haemorrhage and unsafe abortion, allowing relatively safe abortion in legal and illegal settings. However, we know little about how women who want to use misoprostol access it to induce abortion. Based on 15 months of ethnographic fieldwork in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, this chapter describes and analyses how women gain access to misoprostol to induce abortion within a setting where induced abortion is legally restrictive and where the legal use of misoprostol is limited to post-abortion care and post-partum haemorrhage. The findings show that women seeking abortions in Ouagadougou are able to access misoprostol through unofficial channels, specifically through health workers and drug vendors. While this unofficial use of misoprostol is relatively safer, and more affordable than other options, access is not equally distributed and the cost women pay for the drug varies significantly. While women with strong social networks and financial resources can access misoprostol easily, other women who do not have money to buy misoprostol may become victims of sexual violence from men from whom they seek abortion services. In Ouagadougou, access to abortion with misoprostol is shaped by health workers and the social and economic conditions of the women who seek it. The study uses the concepts of ‘pharmaceutical diversion’ and ‘domestication’ as adjacent analytical frameworks to emphasize the changing pattern of access to misoprostol. The chapter introduces the importance of looking at safe access to safe abortion.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference32 articles.
1. Bankole, A., Hussain, R., Sedgh, G., Rossier, C., Kaboré, I., & Guiella, G. (2014). Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Burkina Faso: Causes and consequences. Guttmacher Institute. 2. Baxerres, C., Boko, I., Konkobo, A., Ouattara, F., & Guillaume, A. (2018). Abortion in two francophone African countries: A study of whether women have begun to use misoprostol in Benin and Burkina Faso. Contraception, 97(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.011 3. Berge, K. H., Dillon, K. R., Sikkink, K. M., Taylor, T. K., & Lanier, W. L. (2012). Diversion of drugs within health care facilities, a multiple-victim crime: Patterns of diversion, scope, consequences, detection, and prevention. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 87(7), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.03.013 4. Bodart, C., Servais, G., Mohamed, Y. L., & Schmidt-Ehry, B. (2001). The influence of health sector reform and external assistance in Burkina Faso. Health Policy and Planning, 16(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/16.1.74 5. Childerhose, J. E., & MacDonald, M. E. (2013). Health consumption as work: The home pregnancy test as a domesticated health tool. Social Science & Medicine, 86, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.035
|
|