Abstract
Abstract
Equine back function is of concern to riders, as well as to veterinarians and physiotherapists; these groups may benefit from knowledge about spinal motion on the circle. This descriptive and comparative study aimed to quantify equine neck, back and pelvic motion in walk, trot and canter on a 9 m circle. Sixteen healthy horses in training, of varying breed and conformation, were measured using optical motion capture (150 Hz), with optical markers on the poll, withers, T15, tubera coxae and lumbosacral joint. Cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar flexion–extension and lateral bending, and pelvic roll, pitch and yaw, were statistically evaluated using mixed models. Motion patterns showed distinct differences between gaits, but were generally similar between horses. The thoracolumbar back was bent towards the inside of the circle (stride mean 5-6º for all gaits). The cervicothoracic spine was more flexed in walk (18°), and more extended in canter (-4—-8°), compared to trot (6–7°), whereas the thoracolumbar spine was slightly less extended in canter than in walk. Thoracolumbar flexion–extension range of motion (ROM) increased from walk (4°) to canter (9°), as did pelvic pitch ROM (walk 7° and canter 15–16°), while back lateral bending ROM and pelvic yaw ROM were lowest in trot. Taken together, the study findings suggest that neck and back motion patterns on the circle reflect an interaction between the constraints of circular movement, and the mechanics and characteristics of each gait.
Funder
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Veterinary,General Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. Audigié F, Pourcelot P, Degueurce C, Denoix JM, Geiger D, Bortolussi C (1998) Asymmetry in placement of bilateral skin markers on horses and effects of asymmetric skin marker placement on kinematic variables. Am J Vet Res 59:938–944
2. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P (2018) EquiMoves: a wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait. Sensors (Basel) 18:850. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030850
3. Brocklehurst C, Weller R, Pfau T (2014) Effect of turn direction on body lean angle in the horse in trot and canter. Vet J 199:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.11.009
4. Byström A, Hardeman AM, Serra Bragança FM, Roepstorff L, Swagemakers JH, van Weeren PR, Egenvall A (2021) Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot. Sci Rep 11:12832. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92272-2
5. Byström A, Clayton HM, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Egenvall A (2020) Equestrian and biomechanical perspectives on laterality in the horse. Comp Exerc Phys 16:35–45. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP190022
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献