1. Böckenholt, U., & Böckenholt, I. (1990). Canonical analysis of contingency tables with linear constraints.Psychometrika, 55, 633–639.
2. Carroll, J. D. (1973). Models and algorithms for multidimensional scaling, conjoint measurement and related techniques. In P. E. Green & Y. Wind (Eds.),Multiattribute decisions in marketing: A measurement approach (pp. 299–387). New York: Dryden Press.
3. Carroll, J. D., Pruzansky, S., & Kruskal, J. B. (1980). CANDELINC: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters.Psychometrika, 45, 3–24.
4. Cazes, P., Chessel, D., & Doledec, S. (1988). L'analyse des correspondances internes d'un tableau partitionné: Son usage en hydrobiologie [Internal correspondence analysis of a partitioned table: Its use in hydrobiology].Revue des Statistique Appliquée, 36, 39–54.
5. Chessel, D., Lebreton, J. D., & Yoccoz, N. (1987). Propriétés de l'analyse canonique des correspondances: Une illustration en hydrobiologie [Properties of canonical correspondence analysis: An illustration in hydrobiology.]Revue des Statistique Appliquée, 35, 55–72.