Abstract
AbstractThe Anthropocene has been observed as an opportunity to generate new legal imaginaries capable of revising incumbent assumptions of legal and political thought. What opportunities do such ambitions afford for communication between geological and legal thought? Responding to Birrell & Matthews attempt to ‘re-story a law for, rather than of, the Anthropocene,’ I wish to describe some ways in which the Anthropocene Working Group, who are pursuing formalisation of the Anthropocene as an official geological unit, are involved in a similar exercise of re-storying geology. The Anthropocene theme is brought to bear as a geological reality through material practices of measurement and correlation, as well as through the invocation of previous judgements of the evaluative committees associated with the formalisation of new geological unit. This effort amounts to a redefinition of the practices of geological observation, i.e. what counts as geologically relevant and why. In keeping with the theme of an ‘ethics of encounter’, as encouraged by Birrell and Matthews, this article suggests that the AWG’s effort provides a model with which the elaboration of ‘laws for the Anthropocene’ might correspond.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Ager, Derek. 1981. The Nature of the Stratigraphic Record. London: Wiley.
2. Aubry, Marie Pierre. 2007. Chronostratigraphy beyond the GSSP. Stratigraphy 4 (2/3): 127–134.
3. Aubry, Marie Pierre. 2009. Thinking of deep time. Stratigraphy 6 (2): 93–99.
4. Autin, Whitney, and John Holbrook. 2012. Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture? GSA Today 22 (7): 60–61.
5. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby. 2008. Necrocapitalism. Organization Studies 29 (12): 1541–1563.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献