Abstract
AbstractAdopting Kantor’s Masochean turn within Levinas, this article challenges the anthropocentrically limited purview of Levinas’s ethical relation. Incorporating Kantor’s legalistic reading of Levinas, informed through his literary analysis of Sacher-Masoch’s ‘Venus in Furs’, the article details the inescapable, legalistic plight that is to be the Levinasian ethical subject. Extending upon Kantor’s introductory conceptualisation of the Levinasian subject through Masoch, reveals a subject for whom suffering and sacrifice must be embraced; necessary acts of penitence before an irrepressible Other who they adore. The Other is presented through Masoch’s text as an insatiable, inescapable deity of Law who cannot be refused and demands subservience. A god manifest in Exteriority whose influence upon the subject extends beyond the frame of the interhuman relation and is a necessary component of the subject’s existence and, more broadly, their world. The Levinasian subject’s relation with alterity poetically portraying all the potency, affirmation and urgency of dear Severin’s with his Venus, a relation which destroys, haunts and affirms the subject completely as only Law can.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Alford, C.. F. 2004. Levinas and Political Theory. Political Theory 32 (2): 146–171.
2. Antadze, N. 2019. Who is the Other in the age of the Anthropocene? Introducing the Unknown Other in climate justice discourse. The Anthropocene Review 6 (1–2): 38–54.
3. Atterton, P. 2018. Levinas’s Humanism and Anthropocentrism. In The Oxford Handbook of Levinas, ed. Michael L. Morgan, 709–731. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Boothroyd, D. 2018. Levinas on Ecology and Nature. In The Oxford Handbook of Levinas, ed. Michael L. Morgan, 769–785. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Braidotti, R. 2016. Post Human Critical Theory. In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, ed. Debashi Banerji and Makarand R. Paranjape, 13–32. New Delhi: Springer.