Abstract
AbstractThis article seeks to decentre the proprietary author in copyright law by attending to some peripheral matters of Immanuel Kant’s periodical essay, ‘On the Wrongfulness of Reprinting’ (1785), as indices of its medial-material conditions of possibility. We consider not only the epitextual background of the German Enlightenment in which the Berlinische Monatsschrift was produced, but also the peritextual specimens of catchwords, signature marks, and various front matter of Kant’s essay. This medial reading suggests the periodical to be deeply involved in the operations of a print machinery preceding the authorial figure, the existence of which perturbs copyright law’s attachment to original authorship.
Funder
National University of Singapore
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Barron, Anne. 2012. Kant, copyright and communicative freedom. Law and Philosophy 31: 1–48.
2. Barthes, Roland. 1977. The death of the author. In Image music text, 142–148. London: Fontana Press.
3. Borghi, Maurizio. 2011. Copyright and truth. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12: 1–27.
4. Bowrey, Kathy. 2016. Law, aesthetics and copyright historiography: A critical reading of the genealogies of Martha Woodmansee and Mark Rose. In Research handbook on the history of copyright law, eds. Isabella Alexander and H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui, 27–52. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
5. Brandes, Helga. 2005. The literary marketplace and the journal, medium of the Enlightenment. In German literature of the eighteenth century: The enlightenment and sensibility, ed. Barbara Becker-Cantarino, 79–102. New York: Camden House.