Abstract
AbstractEmbedding randomization procedures in the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) has recently attracted an increasing amount of interest as a remedy to the fact that the direct multi-block generalization of ADMM is not necessarily convergent. Even if, in practice, the introduction of such techniques could mitigate the diverging behaviour of the multi-block extension of ADMM, from the theoretical point of view, it can ensure just the convergence in expectation, which may not be a good indicator of its robustness and efficiency. In this work, analysing the strongly convex quadratic programming case from a linear algebra perspective, we interpret the block Gauss–Seidel sweep performed by the multi-block ADMM in the context of the inexact Augmented Lagrangian Method. Using the proposed analysis, we are able to outline an alternative technique to those present in the literature which, supported from stronger theoretical guarantees, is able to ensure the convergence of the multi-block generalization of the ADMM method.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Algebra and Number Theory
Reference58 articles.
1. Arrow, K.J., Hurwicz, L., Uzawa, H.: Studies in Linear and Non-linear Programming. With contributions by H. B. Chenery, S. M. Johnson, S. Karlin, T. Marschak, R. M. Solow. Stanford Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, vol. II. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1958)
2. Benzi, M., Golub, G.H., Liesen, J.: Numerical solution of saddle point problems. Acta Numer. 14, 1–137 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492904000212
3. Billingsley, P.: Probability and Measure. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)
4. Birken, P.: Termination criteria for inexact fixed-point schemes. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 22(4), 702–716 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/nla.1982
5. Bodewig, E.: Matrix Calculus. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)