Abstract
AbstractVirtual reality (VR) can enhance mental health care. In particular, the effectiveness of VR-based exposure therapy (VRET) has been well-demonstrated for treatment of anxiety disorders. However, most applications of VRET remain localized to clinic spaces. We aimed to explore mental health therapists’ perceptions of telehealth-based VRET (tele-VRET) by conducting semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 18 telemental health therapists between October and December 2022. Interview topics included telehealth experiences, exposure therapy over telehealth, previous experiences with VR, and perspectives on tele-VRET. Therapists described how telehealth reduced barriers (88.9%, 16/18), enhanced therapy (61.1%, 11/18), and improved access to clients (38.9%, 7/18), but entailed problems with technology (61.1%, 11/18), uncontrolled settings (55.6%, 10/18), and communication difficulties (50%, 9/18). Therapists adapted exposure therapy to telehealth by using online resources (66.7%, 12/18), preparing client expectations (55.6%, 10/18), and adjusting workflows (27.8%, 5/18). Most therapists had used VR before (72.2%, 13/18) and had positive impressions of VR (55.6%, 10/18), but none had used VR clinically. In response to tele-VRET, therapists requested interactive session activities (77.8%, 14/18) and customizable interventions components (55.6%, 10/18). Concerns about tele-VRET included risks with certain clients (77.8%, 14/18), costs (50%, 9/18), side effects and privacy (22.2%, 4/18), and inappropriateness for specific forms of exposure therapy (16.7%, 3/18). These results reveal how combining telehealth and VRET may expand therapeutic options for mental healthcare providers and can help inform collaborative development of immersive health technologies.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
National Institute of Mental Health, United States
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Aafjes-Van Doorn K, Békés V, Luo X, Hopwood CJ (2023) Therapists’ perception of the working alliance, real relationship and therapeutic presence in in-person therapy versus tele-therapy. Psychother Res J Soc Psychother Res 3:1–15
2. American Psychological Association (2022) Demographics of U.S. psychology workforce [Interactive data tool]. In: Demographics of U.S. Psychology Workforce (2020). https://www.apa.org/workforce/data-tools/demographics
3. Aviram A, Nadan Y (2023) “I miss not being able to offer my couples a box of tissues…”: Couples’ and therapists’ perspectives on the therapeutic alliance with the transition to online couple therapy. Fam Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12853
4. Baghaei N, Stemmet L, Hlasnik A, Emanov K, Hach S, Naslund JA, Billinghurst M, Khaliq I, Liang H-N (2020) Time to get personal: individualised virtual reality for mental health. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 1–9
5. Bakk ÁK (2023) Representing mental disorders with virtual reality applications: designing for multimodality and complex participation. Front Virtual Reality 3:881766. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.881766