Abstract
Abstract
In many mammal species, mothers are crucial for the survival and development of young offspring. In primates, maternal investment may ensure immatures’ survival and also foster their social integration in the group, providing long-term fitness benefits. In this study, we analysed maternal investment in a wild group (N = 49) of male philopatric spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). We assessed whether maternal investment is biased toward sons (compared with daughters) and which factors modulate this relation. We studied 20 mother–offspring dyads, measuring the time mothers spent in body contact, nursing, carrying, grooming, and playing with their offspring, for a total of 359 focal samples from February to July 2022. We then ran generalized linear mixed models to assess how these responses varied depending on the two-way interactions of offspring sex with offspring age, maternal age, and maternal centrality. Our results showed that mothers were more likely to nurse, carry, and have body contact with younger than older offspring, regardless of their sex. However, we also found that mothers invested more in male than female offspring; differences were mediated by mothers’ age and social integration in the group. Older mothers, in particular, were more likely to carry sons than daughters, whereas the contrary was true for younger mothers. Moreover, socially more central mothers were more likely to be in body contact with sons than daughters. Overall, our study shows that some maternal behaviours are sex-biased in male-philopatric species, although maternal experience and social integration may modulate this relation.
Funder
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference85 articles.
1. Ahumada, J. A. (1992). Grooming behavior of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. International Journal of Primatology, 13(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547726
2. American Society of Primatologists. (2001). Principles for the ethical treatment of nonhuman primates. https://www.asp.org/2021/04/20/principles-for-the-ethical-treatment-of-non-human-primates/. Accessed 13 February 2023
3. Amici, F., Kulik, L., Langos, D., & Widdig, A. (2019). Growing into adulthood—a review on sex differences in the development of sociality across macaques. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 73(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2623-2
4. Amici, F., Widdig, A., MacIntosh, A. J., Francés, V. B., Castellano-Navarro, A., Caicoya, A. L., ... & Majolo, B. (2020). Dominance style only partially predicts differences in neophobia and social tolerance over food in four macaque species. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79246-6
5. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3–4), 227–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00534
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献