COMMONSIM: Simulating the utopia of COMMONISM

Author:

Gerdes Lena,Aigner Ernest,Meretz Stefan,Pahl Hanno,Schlemm Annette,Scholz-Wäckerle ManuelORCID,Schröter Jens,Sutterlütti Simon

Abstract

AbstractThis research article presents an agent-based simulation hereinafter called COMMONSIM. It builds on COMMONISM, i.e. a large-scale commons-based vision for a utopian society. In this society, production and distribution of means are not coordinated via markets, exchange and money, or a central polity, but via bottom-up signalling and polycentric networks, i.e. ex ante coordination via needs. Heterogeneous agents care for each other in life groups and produce in different groups care, environmental as well as intermediate and final means to satisfy sensual-vital needs. Productive needs decide on the magnitude of activity in groups for a common interest, e.g. the production of means in a multi-sectoral artificial economy. Agents share cultural traits identified by different behaviours: a propensity for egoism, leisure, environmentalism and productivity. The narrative of this utopian society follows principles of critical psychology and sociology, complexity and evolution, the theory of commons and critical political economy. The article presents the utopia and an agent-based study of it, with emphasis on culture-dependent allocation mechanisms and their social and economic implications for agents and groups.

Funder

Volkswagen Foundation

Vienna University of Economics and Business

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference85 articles.

1. Albert M (2003) Parecon: life after capitalism. Verso

2. Apolito A (2020) The problem of scale in anarchism and the case for cybernetic communism. Retrieved from www.its.caltech.edu/~matilde/ScaleAnarchy.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2023

3. Aspalter C (2021) Back to the origins. The ideal-type methodology in social sciences as developed by Max Weber. In: Aspalter C (ed) Ideal types in comparative social policy. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY, pp 90–104

4. Baran P, Sweezy PM (1966) Monopoly Capital: an essay on the American economic and social order. Monthly Review Press, New York

5. Biesecker A, Hofmeister S (2010) Focus: (re) productivity: sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders. Ecol Econ 69(8):1703–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3