Abstract
AbstractThis research article presents an agent-based simulation hereinafter called COMMONSIM. It builds on COMMONISM, i.e. a large-scale commons-based vision for a utopian society. In this society, production and distribution of means are not coordinated via markets, exchange and money, or a central polity, but via bottom-up signalling and polycentric networks, i.e. ex ante coordination via needs. Heterogeneous agents care for each other in life groups and produce in different groups care, environmental as well as intermediate and final means to satisfy sensual-vital needs. Productive needs decide on the magnitude of activity in groups for a common interest, e.g. the production of means in a multi-sectoral artificial economy. Agents share cultural traits identified by different behaviours: a propensity for egoism, leisure, environmentalism and productivity. The narrative of this utopian society follows principles of critical psychology and sociology, complexity and evolution, the theory of commons and critical political economy. The article presents the utopia and an agent-based study of it, with emphasis on culture-dependent allocation mechanisms and their social and economic implications for agents and groups.
Funder
Volkswagen Foundation
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference85 articles.
1. Albert M (2003) Parecon: life after capitalism. Verso
2. Apolito A (2020) The problem of scale in anarchism and the case for cybernetic communism. Retrieved from www.its.caltech.edu/~matilde/ScaleAnarchy.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2023
3. Aspalter C (2021) Back to the origins. The ideal-type methodology in social sciences as developed by Max Weber. In: Aspalter C (ed) Ideal types in comparative social policy. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY, pp 90–104
4. Baran P, Sweezy PM (1966) Monopoly Capital: an essay on the American economic and social order. Monthly Review Press, New York
5. Biesecker A, Hofmeister S (2010) Focus: (re) productivity: sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders. Ecol Econ 69(8):1703–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献