1. Aimeric, Ars lectoria, ed. H. J. Reijnders, in Vivarium 9 (1971): 119–37; 10 (1972): 41–101, 124–76.
2. Conrad of Hirsau, Dialogus super auctores, ed. R. B. C. Huygens (Leiden: Brill, 1970); Alexander Nequam, Sacerdos ad altare accessurus (in Corrogationes Promethei, MS Oxford, Bod. Lib., Bodley 550), cited in Tony Hunt, Teaching and Learning in Thirteenth-Century England, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), I:270. For a useful typology of grammatical glosses on Ovid’s texts in the Middle Ages, see Ralph Hexter, Ovid and Medieval Schooling: Studies in Medieval School Commentaries on Ovid’s Ars amatoria, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Epistulae heroidum (Munich: Arbeo-Gesellschaft, 1986).
3. Guibert de Nogent, Monodiae, trans. Paul J. Archambault (University Park: Penn State University Press, 1996), I:17.
4. Jean Seznec, The Survival of the Pagan Gods: The Mythological Tradition and Its Place In Renaissance Humanism and Art, trans. Barbara Sessions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953); Don Cameron Allen, Mysteriously Meant: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical Interpretation in the Renaissance (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970); Judson B. Allen, Friar as Critic: Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1971), esp. pp. 3–28, 59–60, and The Ethical Poetic of the Later Middle Ages: A decorum of convenient distinction (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982), esp. pp. 3–116.
5. Kathryn Gravdal, Ravishing Maidens: Writing Rape in Medieval French Literature and Law (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991) and Vilain and Courtois: Transgressive Parody in French Literature of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989).