Scepticism, Relativism and Ethics

Author:

Munslow Alun

Publisher

Macmillan Education UK

Reference30 articles.

1. Historians of a particular kind will tend to accept the arguments offered by the ‘common sense’ philosophers G. E. Moore and John Austin that material objects exist and hence they dismiss sceptical concerns as pointless theoretical reflection. See G. E. Moore, Philosophical Papers (London, 1959)

2. see also J. L. Austin, Philosophical Papers (Oxford, 1961), and How to Do Things with Words (Oxford, 1962). Moore is famous for his‘proof’of common sense by demonstrating that two human hands exist by describing how he can move them–first one then the other. This common sense approach is basic to conventional history thinking–two hands on the past? But while this remains unconvincing to the multiple-sceptic the conventional claim that flows from it is even stranger. Hold up your two hands, place them palm to palm. See how they match? Imagine the left hand is the past and the right is history. There is no dissonance. The reason is that they have been placed palm to palm–but they are not symmetrical if they are placed sideways and overlapped. They no longer look the same and cannot be aligned. A crude analogy I admit, but doesn’t it make you think…? For a defence of Moore see Thompson Clarke, ‘The Legacy of Skepticism’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68, pp. 754–69. This common sense notion is also widespread outside the historical profession. See Gabriela Dumbrava’s defence of the ways in which narrative at once assimilates and returns us to experience in ‘Turning History into Culture: The Narrative Discourse as a Way Out of the Museum’, European Journal of English Studies, vol. 11, no. 3 (December, 2007), pp. 251–61.

3. As we shall see again later, this also raises the adjacent issue of subjectivity and the situation whereby no one, as Keith Jenkins has argued, ‘comes from, or writes from, nowhere. Everyone has a position…’, Keith Jenkins, ‘Sande Cohen: On the Verge of Newness’, Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, vol. 12, no. 4 (2008), pp. 437–62.

4. Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Book 1, 35–9 in Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes, The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations (Cambridge, 1985), p. 19.

5. Paul O’Grady, Relativism (Chesham, 2002), p. 2.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3