Progressing Intelligence
Publisher
Macmillan Education UK
Reference5 articles.
1. The IT procedure and results can be seen in the following paper that a quick search of the internet retrieves: Bates, T. C. & Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Intelligence, inspection time, and decision time. Intelligence, 17, 523–531.
2. Pesta, B. J. & Poznanski, P. J. (2009). The inspection time and over-claiming tasks as predictors of MBA student performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 236–240.
3. There is some independent evidence that higher psychometric intelligence is associated with more regular ERP waveforms; this supports Eysenck’s claim of an association between psychometric intelligence and fewer error-prone processes, although the evidence is not overly impressive. Jausovec, N. & Jausovec, K. (2000). Correlations between ERP parameters and intelligence: a reconsideration. Biological Psychology, 50, 137–154. The importance of this work was recognised in the exhibition, ‘Mind your Head? 100 years of psychology in Britain’, opened in January 2001 at the Science Museum in London. Part of the exhibition is the Bio-signal Laboratory, set up at the Bethlem Royal Hospital in London by Eysenck. Some of the equipment can be seen at:
http://freespace.virgin.net
/darrin.evans/hjescmus.htm
4. Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Intelligence: A New Look. London: Transaction Publishers.
5. In support of the importance and continued relevance of Eysenck’s focus on intelligence, see the cutting-edge review of its genetic and biological bases, and implications for psychology/psychiatry, and society more generally by: Plomin, R. & Deary, I. J. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 98–108.