1. Ainsworth, S., & Flathman, M. (1995). Unanimous consent agreements as leadership tools. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20(2), 177–195.
2. Aldrich, J. H., Berger, M. M., & Rohde, D. W. (2002). The historical variability in conditional party government. In D. Brady & M. D. McCubbins (Eds.), Party, process, and political change in congress: New perspectives on the history of congress (pp. 1877–1994). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
3. Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (2000). The republican revolution and the house appropriations committee. Journal of Politics, 62(1), 1–33.
4. Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (2001). The logic of conditional party government: Revisiting the electoral connection. In L. C. Dodd & B. I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
5. Aldrich, J. H., Rohde, D. W., & Tofias, M. W. (2005). One D is not enough: Measuring conditional party government. In D. Brady & M. D. McCubbins (Eds.), Process, party and policy making: Further new perspectives on the history of congress (pp. 1887–2002). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.