Comparative Analysis of Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing During COVID-19 Lockdown Period in Peninsular India
-
Published:2024-09-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0255-660X
-
Container-title:Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Indian Soc Remote Sens
Author:
Kotrike Tharani, Keesara Venkata Reddy, Sridhar VenkataramanaORCID, Pratap Deva
Abstract
AbstractThe load of aerosols in the atmosphere has been increasing gradually due to industrialization and urbanization. This increase has contributed to change in the Earth’s radiation budget through the absorption or scattering of radiation. The aerosol direct radiative forcing (ADRF) is a measurement utilized to comprehend the impact of cooling or warming up of the atmosphere directly by aerosols. Our study examined the impact of aerosols during the COVID-19 pandemic by comparing them to the average from the preceding 5-year period (2015–2019) in peninsular India. The measure of aerosols deployed in this study is the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), and the study was carried out on three distinct time frames: prior to lockdown, during lockdown, and post lockdown. The study revealed that the ADRF increased during all the three time frames of 2020 compared to the average of 2015–2019, and the other time scales experienced an increase in ADRF as well. The most notable rise in ADRF and decrease in temperature occurred in the tropical savanna and warm semi-arid climate regions during the pre-lockdown period. During lockdown, the increase in ADRF was seen throughout the study area, and a decrease in temperature was observed only in the tropical monsoon region. In the post-lockdown period, the decline in ADRF was accompanied by a fall in temperature in the tropical savanna region. This study provides insights into the effect of aerosols on ADRF in peninsular India and highlights the importance of monitoring and regulating aerosol emissions to mitigate the changes in temperature.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Allen, S. K., Plattner, G. K., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., & Stocker, T.F. (2014). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. An overview of the Working Group 1 contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In EGU general assembly conference abstracts (p. 3544). 2. Anil, S., Manikanta, V., & Pallakury, A. R. (2021). Unravelling the influence of subjectivity on ranking of CMIP6 based climate models: A case study. International Journal of Climatology, 41(13), 5998–6016. 3. Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Stevens, B. (2020). Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(1), e2019RG000660. 4. Buchard, V., Randles, C. A., Da Silva, A. M., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P. R., Govindaraju, R. & Yu, H. (2017). The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part II: Evaluation and case studies. Journal of Climate, 30(17), 6851–6872. 5. Chakraborty, A., Kumar Das, P., Sesha Sai, M.V.R. & Behera, G., (2012). Spatial pattern of temporal trend of crop phenology matrices over india using timeseries gimms NDVI data (19826ndash; 2006). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38, 113–118
|
|