Abstract
AbstractOxygen minimum zones in the open ocean are predicted to significantly increase in volume over the coming decades as a result of anthropogenic climatic warming. The resulting reduction in dissolved oxygen (DO) in the pelagic realm is likely to have detrimental impacts on water-breathing organisms, particularly those with higher metabolic rates, such as billfish, tunas, and sharks. However, little is known about how free-living fish respond to low DO environments, and therefore, the effect increasing OMZs will have cannot be predicted reliably. Here, we compare the responses of two active predators (bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus and yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares) to DO at depth throughout the eastern Pacific Ocean. Using time-series data from 267 tagged tunas (59,910 days) and 3D maps of modelled DO, we find that yellowfin tuna respond to low DO at depth by spending more time in shallower, more oxygenated waters. By contrast, bigeye tuna, which forage at deeper depths well below the thermocline, show fewer changes in their use of the water column. However, we find that bigeye tuna increased the frequency of brief upward vertical excursions they performed by four times when DO at depth was lower, but with no concomitant significant difference in temperature, suggesting that this behaviour is driven in part by the need to re-oxygenate following time spent in hypoxic waters. These findings suggest that increasing OMZs will impact the behaviour of these commercially important species, and it is therefore likely that other water-breathing predators with higher metabolic rates will face similar pressures. A more comprehensive understanding of the effect of shoaling OMZs on pelagic fish vertical habitat use, which may increase their vulnerability to surface fisheries, will be important to obtain if these effects are to be mitigated by future management actions.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Baez JC, Pascual-Alayon P, Ramos ML, Abascal FJ (2018) Tropical tunas: global warming and food security, an overview. Rev Biol Mar Oceanogr 53:1–8
2. Bernal D, Bernal D, Sepulveda C, Brill R (2010) The eco-physiology of swimming and movement patterns of tunas, bill fishes, and large pelagic sharks. In: Domenici PK, Kapoor BG (eds) Fish locomotion, an etho-ecological perspective. Science Publishers, Enfield, USA
3. Bernal D, Brill RW, Dickson KA, Shiels HA (2017) Sharing the water column: physiological mechanisms underlying species-specific habitat use in tunas. Rev Fish Biol Fish 27:843–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-017-9497-7
4. Bertrand A, Bard FX, Josse E (2002a) Tuna food habits related to the micronekton distribution in French Polynesia. Mar Biol 140:1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-001-0776-3
5. Bertrand A, Josse E, Bach P, Gros P, Dagorn L (2002b) Hydrological and trophic characteristics of tuna habitat: consequences on tuna distribution and longline catchability. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1002–1013. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-073