Impact of climate change on the distribution and habitat suitability of the world’s main commercial squids
-
Published:2023-09-01
Issue:10
Volume:170
Page:
-
ISSN:0025-3162
-
Container-title:Marine Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Mar Biol
Author:
Guerreiro Miguel FernandesORCID, Borges Francisco Oliveira, Santos Catarina Pereira, Xavier José Carlos, Hoving Henk-Jan, Rosa Rui
Abstract
AbstractClimate change is expected to have major negative effects on marine life across phylogenetic groups. Cephalopods, however, have life history characteristics that suggest they may benefit from certain climate change scenarios. Of all cephalopods, squids reach the greatest biomasses; as a result, they are of substantial importance for human and predator consumption. To test the hypothesis that the effects of climate change are beneficial for commercial squid, we used species distribution models on climate scenarios for the period between 2000 and 2014, as well as the years 2050 and 2100 (RCP [representative concentration pathway] 2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5; CMIP5). Our results suggest that consequences of climate change scenarios are species specific. In the North Pacific and Northwest Atlantic, squid’s habitat suitability may increase (from + 0.83% [Doryteuthis pealeii] to + 8.77% increase [Illex illecebrosus]), while it is predicted to decrease in other regions (from − 1.03% [Doryteuthis opalescens] to − 15.04% decrease [Loligo reynaudii]). Increases in habitat suitability occurred mostly at higher latitudes (north of 50° N), while suitable habitat decrease was predicted for the tropical regions. These shifts in future habitat suitability were stronger under harsher emission scenarios. Starting in 2050 (with RCP scenarios 4.6, 6.0 and 8.5), as a result of warming of the Arctic, squid habitat may increase along both coasts of North America. In the Southern Hemisphere, squids may lose habitat with no poleward habitat alternatives to move into. Contrary to our hypothesis, these commercial squid do not stand to benefit from climate change. Since these squid are an important food source for marine megafauna and humans, it is imperative that climate change biogeographic impacts are considered for a sustainable management of this important group of molluscs.
Funder
GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference89 articles.
1. Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43(6):1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x 2. Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010 3. Araújo MB, Rahbek C (2006) How does climate change affect biodiversity? Science 313:1396–1397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131758 4. Arkhipkin AI, Rodhouse PGK, Pierce GJ, Sauer W, Sakai M, Allcock L, Arguelles J, Bower JR, Castillo G, Ceriola L, Chen C-S, Chen X, Diaz-Santana M, Downey N, González AF, Granados Amores J, Green CP, Guerra A, Hendrickson LC, Ibáñez C, Ito K, Jereb P, Kato Y, Katugin ON, Kawano M, Kidokoro H, Kulik VV, Laptikhovsky VV, Lipinski MR, Liu B, Mariátegui L, Marin W, Medina A, Miki K, Miyahara K, Moltschaniwskyj N, Moustahfid H, Nabhitabhata J, Nanjo N, Nigmatullin CM, Ohtani T, Pecl G, Perez JAA, Piatkowski U, Saikliang P, Salinas-Zavala CA, Steer M, Tian Y, Ueta Y, Vijai D, Wakabayashi T, Yamaguchi T, Yamashiro C, Yamashita N, Zeidberg LD (2015) World squid fisheries. Rev Fish Sci Aquac 23:92–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2015.1026226 5. Arkhipkin AI, Nigmatullin ChM, Parkyn DC, Winter A, Csirke J (2022) High seas fisheries: the Achilles’ heel of major straddling squid resources. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-022-09733-8
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|