Abstract
AbstractSince the discovery of the first oncaeid copepod described by Philippi in 1843 as Oncaea venusta, great progress has been achieved regarding the morphological/descriptive taxonomy of the microcopepod family Oncaeidae, occurring in all great oceans and all depth layers of the ocean. The species diversity of this family is still underestimated and the ecological role of oncaeids within the marine ecosystem is not yet well understood, but the life strategy appears to be fundamentally different from most other pelagic microcopepod families. The present paper aims at a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge of this microcopepod family, including taxonomic and phylogenetic issues, questions of species identification, specific morphological and molecular genetic characteristics, information on regional and vertical distribution and abundance, motion behaviour, feeding and food relationships, reproduction aspects, biomass and elemental composition, respiration and metabolic rates. Relevant open questions are highlighted, and examples are given of shortcomings and high uncertainties in results of current attempts to include oncaeid copepods in various aspects of global marine ecosystem studies. It is concluded that continued support of taxonomic research is required for Oncaeidae and other small copepod species, based on an integrated approach of morphological and molecular genetic methods and user-friendly regional identification keys, to allow an adequate consideration of oncaeids in advanced ecological studies and to achieve a better understanding of the ecological role of this abundant microcopepod family in marine ecosystems.
Funder
GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference289 articles.
1. Abe Y, Hildebrandt N, Matsuno K, Niehoff B, Yamaguchi A (2020) Comparison of the vertical distribution of pelagic copepod abundance, biomass and community structure between the Atlantic and Pacific sectors of the Arctic Ocean. Bull Fish Sci Hokkaido Univ 70(1):91–102. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=406841
2. Aberle N, Hansen T, Boettger-Schnack R, Burmeister A, Post AF, Sommer U (2010) Differential routing of ‘new’ nitrogen toward higher trophic levels within the marine food web of the Gulf of Aqaba, Northern Red Sea. Mar Biol 157(1):157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1306-y
3. Albuquerque R, Bode A, González-Gordillo JI, Duarte CM, Queiroga H (2021) Trophic structure of neuston across tropical and subtropical oceanic provinces assessed with stable isotopes. Front Mar Sci 7:606088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.606088
4. Alldredge AL (1972) Abandoned larvacean houses: a unique food source in the pelagic environment. Science, New York 177:885–887. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=72241
5. Arthur DK (1976) Food and feeding of larvae of three fishes occurring in the California Current, Sardinops sagax, Engraulis mordax and Trachurus symmetricus. Fish Bull 74(3):517–530